Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> Of the two situations, I think the first one is less likely to be
> destructive (noticing that a file is already gone via ENOTDIR), as we
> are only proceeding with the index deletion, and we end up not touching
> the filesystem at all.
Nice to see sound reasoning.
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rm.c b/builtin/rm.c
> index dabfcf6..7b91d52 100644
> --- a/builtin/rm.c
> +++ b/builtin/rm.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int check_local_mod(unsigned char *head, int
> index_only)
> ce = active_cache[pos];
>
> if (lstat(ce->name, &st) < 0) {
> - if (errno != ENOENT)
> + if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
OK. We may be running lstat() on D/F but there may be D that is not
a directory. If it is a file, we get ENOTDIR.
By the way, if D is a dangling symlink, we get ENOENT; in such a
case, we report "rm 'D/F'" on the output and remove the index entry.
$ rm -f .git/index && rm -fr D E
$ mkdir D && >D/F && git add D && rm -fr D
$ ln -s erewhon D && git rm D/F && git ls-files
rm 'D/F'
Also if D is a symlink that point at a directory E, "git rm" does
something interesting.
(1) Perhaps we want a complaint in this case.
$ rm -f .git/index && rm -fr D E
$ mkdir D && >D/F && git add D && rm -fr D
$ mkdir E && ln -s E D && git rm D/F
(2) Perhaps we want to make sure D/F is not beyond a symlink in this
case.
$ rm -f .git/index && rm -fr D E
$ mkdir D && >D/F && git add D && rm -fr D
$ mkdir E && ln -s E D && date >E/F && git rm D/F
$ git rm -f D/F
> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index 57394e4..f9e7355 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ int remove_path(const char *name)
> {
> char *slash;
>
> - if (unlink(name) && errno != ENOENT)
> + if (unlink(name) && errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
> return -1;
Ditto.
>
> slash = strrchr(name, '/');
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
