Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> writes: > OK, I take it back. I *can* imagine configurations that this change > would break, since it does change intentional and documented behavior, > but I don't have any such configuration. The only such configuration I > can imagine involves directly counting on the non-rewriting of pushUrl, > by using pushInsteadOf to rewrite urls and then sometimes using pushUrl > to override that and point back at the un-rewritten URL. And while > supported, that does seem *odd*. > > Objection withdrawn; if nobody can come up with a sensible configuration > that relies on the documented behavior, I don't particularly care if it > changes.
I actually do. Given the popularity of the system, "people involved in this thread cannot imagine a case that existing people may get hurt" is very different from "this is not a regression". After merging this change when people start complaining, you and Rob can hide and ignore them, but we collectively as the Git project have to have a way to help them when it happens. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
