Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > >> Okay, I'm confused: why are you waiting for 2.0 to change push.default >> then? Isn't that just a "slightly better default at the porcelain >> level" and hence a "regular enhancement"? > > No. Among other aspects, "git push" is used heavily by scripts.
Oh, I see. I would've expected scripts to specify the refspec explicitly, instead of relying on a default like this. Then again, I saw jc/push-2.0-default-to-simple -- massive changes to scripts in our own testsuite. This whole "backward compatibility" thing is not black-or-white: it's shades of gray. Can I ask about how "backward incompatible" the other suggestions I listed were, just so I get a rough idea of your scale? Junio seems to be very extremist today. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
