In wt_status_print_change_data, we accept a change_type flag
that is meant to be either WT_STATUS_UPDATED or
WT_STATUS_CHANGED. We then switch() on this value to set
the local variable "status" for each case, but do not
provide a fallback "default" label to the switch statement.
As a result, the compiler realizes that "status" might be
unset, and complains with a warning. To silence this
warning, we use the "int status = status" trick. This is
correct with the current code, as all callers provide one of
the two expected change_type flags. However, it's also a
maintenance trap, as there is nothing to prevent future
callers from passing another flag, nor to document this
assumption.
Instead of using the "x = x" hack, let's handle the default
case in the switch() statement with a die("BUG"). That tells
the compiler and any readers of the code exactly what the
function's input assumptions are.
We could also convert the flag to an enum, which would
provide a compile-time check on the function input. However,
since these flags are part of a larger enum, that would make
the code unnecessarily complex (we would have to make a new
enum with just the two flags, and then convert it to the old
enum for passing to sub-functions).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
---
wt-status.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index ef405d0..7555817 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_change_data(struct wt_status *s,
{
struct wt_status_change_data *d = it->util;
const char *c = color(change_type, s);
- int status = status;
+ int status;
char *one_name;
char *two_name;
const char *one, *two;
@@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ static void wt_status_print_change_data(struct wt_status *s,
}
status = d->worktree_status;
break;
+ default:
+ die("BUG: unhandled change_type %d in
wt_status_print_change_data",
+ change_type);
}
one = quote_path(one_name, -1, &onebuf, s->prefix);
--
1.8.2.rc2.8.g2161951
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
