Re: [PATCH 2/4] remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/ push

[Jeff King]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:46:13PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> +struct remote *remote_get(const char *name)
> +{
> +     int name_given = 0;
> +
> +     read_config();
> +     if (name)
> +             name_given = 1;
> +     else {
> +             name = default_remote_name;
> +             name_given = explicit_default_remote_name;
> +     }
> +     return remote_get_1(name, name_given);
> +}
> +
> +struct remote *pushremote_get(const char *name)
> +{
> +     int name_given = 0;
> +
> +     read_config();
> +     if (name)
> +             name_given = 1;
> +     else {
> +             if (pushremote_name) {
> +                     name = pushremote_name;
> +                     name_given = 1;
> +             } else {
> +                     name = default_remote_name;
> +                     name_given = explicit_default_remote_name;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     return remote_get_1(name, name_given);
> +}

Can we get rid of this duplication by having remote_get_1 take a
service-specific default argument? And then each service calls it like:

  struct remote *remote_get(const char *name)
  {
          read_config();
          return remote_get_1(name, NULL);
  }

  struct remote *pushremote_get(const char *name)
  {
          read_config();
          return remote_get_1(name, pushremote_name);
  }

and all of the name_given junk can stay in remote_get_1. And adding
"remote.default" would just be a matter of changing that NULL in
remote_get.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html