On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> writes: > > > git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL > > conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it > > is here). Is that not the case? > > Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version, > but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on?
How does git-status figure out that file that has been touch'd does not have unstaged changes without relying on this? Surely this case is no different from that? John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
