Thomas Rast <tr...@student.ethz.ch> writes:

> I still think that the _right_ solution is first redoing the merge on
> its original parents and then seeing how the actual merge differs from
> that.

I think that is what was suggested in

    http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198316

> Perhaps a new option to git-rebase could trigger the above behavior for
> merges, who knows.  (It could be called --first-parent.)

Yeah, I think that is what the old thread concluded to be the way to
move forward:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198125

I'll throw it in to the "leftover bits".

    http://git-blame.blogspot.com/2013/02/more-leftover-bits.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to