On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:06:57PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I can believe it. So do we want to do that fix, then? Did you want to > > roll up the two halves of it with a test and write a commit message? I > > feel like you could write a much more coherent one than I could on this > > subject. > > I actually was wondering if we can remove that sole uses of two-way > merge with --reset -u from "git am" and replace them with something > else. But we do want to keep local change that existed before "am" > started, so we cannot avoid use of two-way merge, I guess...
Yeah, I think that is a case we definitely want to keep, as it means any intermediate work done by the user in applying the patch is not lost. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
