Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> writes:
> 
> > I just took a brief look, but that appears to leak memory.
> >
> > "hashmap_free(var, 1)" should be replaced with
> > "hashmap_free_entries(var, struct foo, member)"
> >
> > Only "hashmap_free(var, 0)" can become "hashmap_free(var)"
> 
> I deliberately avoided merge-time band-aid fixups on this topic and
> ew/hashmap exactly because I was sure that I'd introduce a similar
> bugs by doing so myself.  Using evil merges can be a great way to
> help multiple topics polished independently at the same time, but
> when overused, can hide this kind of gotchas quite easily.
> 
> A reroll on top of ew/hashmap would be desirable, now that topic is
> ready for 'master'.

Just to be clear, that reroll should come from Stolee (+Cc-ed), right?
I'll be around to help answer questions, but also pretty busy
with other stuff and I think Stolee knows this API pretty well :>

Reply via email to