Jonathan Tan <jonathanta...@google.com> writes: >> > Also, I have a slight preference for putting "= 02" on the BLAME_COPY >> > line but that is not necessary. >> >> That is absolutely necessary; it is not like "we do not care what >> exact value _COPY gets; it can be any value as long as it is _MOVE >> plus 1", as these are used in set of bits (and again, I do not think >> it is such a brilliant idea to use enum for such a purpose). > > Good point.
Doesn't that also show that enums are not quite a good fit for set of bits (i.e. 1<<n)?
