On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 02:50:40PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
> index ff641b348a..dfd617a845 100755
> --- a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
> +++ b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
> @@ -452,6 +452,33 @@ test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict 
> result' '
>  
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'dir in working tree with symlink ancestor does not 
> produce d/f conflict' '

This test needs the SYMLINKS prereq.

> +     git init sym &&
> +     (
> +             cd sym &&
> +             ln -s . foo &&
> +             mkdir bar &&
> +             touch bar/file &&

Nit: >bar/file (though because of the symlink this test won't be run
on the most fork()-challenged platform).

> +             git add foo bar/file &&
> +             git commit -m "foo symlink" &&
> +
> +             git checkout -b branch1 &&
> +             git commit --allow-empty -m "empty commit" &&
> +
> +             git checkout master &&
> +             git rm foo &&
> +             mkdir foo &&
> +             touch foo/bar &&
> +             git add foo/bar &&
> +             git commit -m "replace foo symlink with real foo dir and 
> foo/bar file" &&
> +
> +             git checkout branch1 &&
> +
> +             # Exercise to make sure that this works without errors
> +             git cherry-pick master

Working without errors is great, but I think this test should also
check that the results are as expected, e.g. 'foo' is now a directory,
etc.

> +     )
> +'
> +
>  test_expect_success 'reset and 3-way merge' '
>  
>       git reset --hard "$c2" &&
> -- 
> 2.23.0.237.gc6a4ce50a0-goog
> 

Reply via email to