On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 22:46, Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> wrote: > > Am 16.09.19 um 21:58 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > > I wonder if the result becomes even clearer if we dropped "instead > > of the usual output". It is a given that presence of an option > > would change the behaviour, so "instead of the usual" does not add > > any value in the context of the explanation we are giving. > > Agreed. > > > Also I question the value of the "running git diff without --raw > > option" sentence; "diff --stat" is also a way to suppress the patch > > text and see only the overview; I know it is not a new problem this > > patch introduces, but the objective of this patch is clarify about > > the generation of output in patch format, so... > > You have a point here, too. > > Below is v2 of just patch 1/2. 2/2 remains unchanged. I've added > git-show to the enumeration.
Yeah, this makes sense. Tested -- this renders fine. Martin
