Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
>> Thanks for spotting it. I wonder if it was broken like this forever
>> since the beginning X-<.
>
> Not quite since the beginning; it comes from 8d2dfc49b1
> (process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering, 2009-04-10). I
> suspect nobody noticed because the cost for the normal case is really
> just shuffling some pointers around. It's only because it actively works
> against the commit-graph optimizations that it's so expensive there.
Yeah, that is what I meant by "since the beginning" (of
commit-graph, that is).
> I was surprised (and pleased) by how much such a simple thing helped.
Yes, it is very pleasing. Thanks.
