Carlo Arenas <care...@gmail.com> writes: > ping > > any feedback on code/approach highly appreciated
I'd prefer to see others weigh in before starting to merge the pcre stuff to 'next'. I do not mind taking this updated one that limits the scope to pcre1 as a pure regressino fix, if others agree. Thanks for keeping a tab on these pcre issues. >> While Ævar made a point[1] that this wasn't a solution to the problem, >> it was because PCRE2 could have a better one (still missing but based >> on ab/pcre-jit-fixes), and it was expected that PCRE2 will be used a >> lot more and so it wasn't a good idea for it (something that doesn't >> apply to PCRE1) >> >> the patch was based on maint (like all bugfixes) but applies cleanly >> to master and next, it will conflict with pu but for easy of merge I'd >> applied it on top of cb/pcre1-cleanup and make it available in >> GitHub[2]; that branch could be used as well as a reroll for that >> topic (if that is preferred) >> >> the error message hasn't been changed on this patch, as it might make >> sense to improve it as well for PCRE2, but at least shouldn't be >> triggered anymore (ex, from running a freshly built git without the >> patch and linked against a non JIT enabled PCRE1): >> >> $ ./git-grep -P 'Nguyễn Thái.Ngọc' >> .mailmap:Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> >> fatal: pcre_exec failed with error code -10 >> >> Carlo >> >> [0] 685668faaa (grep: stop using a custom JIT stack with PCRE v1, 2019-07-26) >> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/87lfwn70nb....@evledraar.gmail.com/ >> [2] https://github.com/carenas/git/tree/pcre1-cleanup
