"brian m. carlson" <sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> writes: > I like the idea of using existing tooling for this and not needing an > additional verb. > > My gut tells me folks may want a bit more control over *which* branches > are rebased, but I don't have a personal need for that, so I'm not going > to request it or propose an interface for it.
FWIW, I am in favor of both of the above two points. It is quite clear because "exec git branch -f <that branch name>" is spelled out, people can remove the ones they want to keep a copy of when they need to. I didn't look at the code more deeply than just eyeballing and noticing style violations etc., and will leave the reviewing to others for now. Thanks.
