On 2019-08-26 at 19:57:45, Ibrahim El wrote:
> Following previous introduction mail [1], this first series of 5 patches is a 
> re-write of the signing interface API in an effort to support easily the 
> addition of new tools with minimal effort and also keeping backwards 
> compatibility with current tools and configuration.
> 
> All existing tests currently pass with backward compatibility.
> 
> [1]: 
> https://public-inbox.org/git/CACi-FhDeAZecXSM36zroty6kpf2BCWLS=0r+duwub96lqfk...@mail.gmail.com/T/#r43cbf31b86642ab5118e6e7b3d4098bade5f5a0a
> 
> The patches are ordered as follow:
> [1/5] - Adding Documentation files explaining the different changes using a 
> design document and updates to the configuration part
> [2/5] - Adding new files that define the signing interface API and also 
> drivers for the existing GPG and GPGSM X.509 tools
> [3/5] - Migrating the code to using the new signing interface API. Old GPG 
> Interface code is commented and ommited
> [4/5] - Removing the old GPG interface and updating the code to remove all 
> gpg mentions from it to make it transparent to the signing tool that is being 
> used
> [5/5] - Duplicating existing signature related tests and updating them to 
> using the new configuration aliases

I haven't done an in-depth review of this series, but I did point out a
few things that stood out to me.  I think the consensus on the list in
the past was that for adding future tools, we'd like the drivers to be
configuration-based so that Git need not learn about every signing tool.
I think such a change would be welcome if done right.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to