Hi René,

On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, René Scharfe wrote:

> Append the strbuf buffer only after detaching it.  There is no practical
> difference here, as the strbuf is not empty and no strbuf_ function is
> called between storing the pointer to the still attached buffer and
> calling strbuf_detach(), so that pointer is valid, but make sure to
> follow the standard sequence anyway for consistency.

ACK!

Thanks,
Dscho

>
> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l....@web.de>
> ---
>  builtin/grep.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/grep.c b/builtin/grep.c
> index 2699001fbd..69ac053acc 100644
> --- a/builtin/grep.c
> +++ b/builtin/grep.c
> @@ -1110,8 +1110,8 @@ int cmd_grep(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
> *prefix)
>                       strbuf_addf(&buf, "+/%s%s",
>                                       strcmp("less", pager) ? "" : "*",
>                                       opt.pattern_list->pattern);
> -                     string_list_append(&path_list, buf.buf);
> -                     strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
> +                     string_list_append(&path_list,
> +                                        strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL));
>               }
>       }
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>

Reply via email to