Duy Nguyen <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> + default:
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + for (; first <= last; first++)
>>
>> This looks odd. If you use the usual last+1 convention between the
>> caller and callee, you do not have to do this, or call this function
>> with "i - 1" and "list->nr -1" as the last parameter.
>
> I know. I just don't know how to name the variable to say "the element
> after the last one".
In case it was unclear, by the "usual last+1 convention", I meant
that it is perfectly normal to write
for (i = first; i < last; i++)
for (i = begin; i < end; i++)
in C. Saying these as
for (i = first; i < beyond_last; i++)
for (i = begin; i < beyond_end; i++)
look non-C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
