Hi, On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > > >> The other warnings in that function are issued using > >> warning_errno() (shorter code, consistency is enforced) and > >> messages are marked for translation. That would be nice to have > >> here as well, no? > > > > Absolutely. Also, downcase "Could" and perhaps use _() around. > > > This one is easy enough (not just in the technical sense, but in the > sense that it has little room wasting our time bikeshedding), so let's > tie the loose ends and move on. > > I was tempted to fix the proposed log message to excise exaggeration > (I prefer not to see "very", "important", etc.---other things that is > said in the message should be enough to convince readers about the > importance), but didn't. > > What I did do was to not just rephrasing the warning message, but to > give it its own constant and to feed it to warning_errno(), to match > the other warning message. > > I also saved one (or perhaps two) fork(s) from the test script ;-) and > added a portability note there. Thanks! On top, I integrated Gabór's suggestion to use `test_config` and threw in a paragraph in the commit message to explain why the `core.longpaths` variable is touched at all. v2 incoming, Dscho
