Dimitriy Ryazantcev <dimitriy.ryazant...@gmail.com> writes:
> -void strbuf_humanise_bytes(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes)
> +static void strbuf_humanise(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes,
> + int humanise_rate)
> {
> if (bytes > 1 << 30) {
> - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u GiB",
> + strbuf_addf(buf,
> + humanise_rate == 0 ?
> + /* TRANSLATORS: IEC 80000-13:2008
> gibibyte */
> + _("%u.%2.2u GiB") :
> + /* TRANSLATORS: IEC 80000-13:2008
> gibibyte/second */
> + _("%u.%2.2u GiB/s"),
> (unsigned)(bytes >> 30),
> (unsigned)(bytes & ((1 << 30) - 1)) / 10737419);
Thanks. I guess that the previous attempt to make it more table
driven was probably a bit overkill, and because it did not quite
work well for Q_(), this would probably be the "good enough, let's
move on" optimal solution ;-)
Will queue.
