On 06/25, Martin Ågren wrote: > Hi Catalin > > Welcome to the list! > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 09:43, Catalin Criste <cris_lin...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ save [-p|--patch] [-k|--[no-]keep-index] > > [-u|--include-untracked] [-a|--all] [-q > > > > This option is deprecated in favour of 'git stash push'. It > > differs from "stash push" in that it cannot take pathspecs, > > - and any non-option arguments form the message. > > + and any non-option arguments from the message. > > I think this is actually intended as "form". It took me a couple of > readings, but what this paragraph wants to say is that any non-option > arguments will be used to form (construct) the message. > > Do you have any suggestions as to how this could be made clearer? > There are at least two of us that have stumbled on this. :-)
Even though I originally wrote this I had to have a double take on it. Maybe what you're saying above would be good? "and any non-option arguments are used to form the message" sounds a little clearer to me. Or maybe even use the word construct? Dunno.
