Am 25.06.19 um 12:11 schrieb Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget:
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> Factor out the code that parses the name of the command at the start of
> each line in the todo file into it's own function so that it can be used
> in the next commit.

"Factor out" sounds like functionality is intended to not be changed...

>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
>  sequencer.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 919e3153f5..793f86bf9a 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -2076,6 +2076,18 @@ const char *todo_item_get_arg(struct todo_list 
> *todo_list,
>       return todo_list->buf.buf + item->arg_offset;
>  }
>
> +static int is_command(enum todo_command command, const char **bol)
> +{
> +     const char *str = todo_command_info[command].str;
> +     const char nick = todo_command_info[command].c;
> +     const char *p = *bol + 1;
> +
> +     return skip_prefix(*bol, str, bol) ||
> +             ((nick && **bol == nick) &&
> +              (*p == ' ' || *p == '\t' || *p == '\n' || *p == '\r' || !*p) &&
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
... but this adds support for LF, CR and NUL as separators after short
commands...

> +              (*bol = p));
> +}
> +
>  static int parse_insn_line(struct repository *r, struct todo_item *item,
>                          const char *buf, const char *bol, char *eol)
>  {
> @@ -2097,12 +2109,7 @@ static int parse_insn_line(struct repository *r, 
> struct todo_item *item,
>       }
>
>       for (i = 0; i < TODO_COMMENT; i++)
> -             if (skip_prefix(bol, todo_command_info[i].str, &bol)) {
> -                     item->command = i;
> -                     break;
> -             } else if ((bol + 1 == eol || bol[1] == ' ' || bol[1] == '\t') 
> &&
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
... while this removes the check against the string's length.

Is this safe? It probably (hopefully?) is, as skip_prefix() requires bol
to point to a NUL-terminated string already.

But is_command() could do the old (and shorter) eol check just as well,
so the next question is: Why this change?

> -                        *bol == todo_command_info[i].c) {
> -                     bol++;
> +             if (is_command(i, &bol)) {
>                       item->command = i;
>                       break;
>               }
>

Reply via email to