On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Brandon Casey wrote:
>
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
> [...]
>> @@ -1096,10 +1117,16 @@ void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int 
>> ignore_footer)
>>       strbuf_addch(&sob, '\n');
>>       for (i = msgbuf->len - 1 - ignore_footer; i > 0 && msgbuf->buf[i - 1] 
>> != '\n'; i--)
>>               ; /* do nothing */
>> -     if (prefixcmp(msgbuf->buf + i, sob.buf)) {
>> -             if (!i || !has_conforming_footer(msgbuf, ignore_footer))
>> -                     strbuf_splice(msgbuf, msgbuf->len - ignore_footer, 0, 
>> "\n", 1);
>> -             strbuf_splice(msgbuf, msgbuf->len - ignore_footer, 0, sob.buf, 
>> sob.len);
>> -     }
>> +
>> +     if (i)
>> +             has_footer = has_conforming_footer(msgbuf, &sob, 
>> ignore_footer);
>
> Is this "if (i)" test needed?  I'd expect that if the message has no newlines,
> has_conforming_footer() would notice that and return 0.

Thanks for pointing out this awkwardness.  It should be pushed into
has_conforming_footer().

-Brandon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to