Am 03.06.19 um 16:25 schrieb Drew DeVault:
> +--check::
> +     Instead of applying the patch(es), see if they are
> +     applicable to the current working tree and/or the index
> +     file and detects errors.

I have to wonder how --check works when 'am' applies multiple patches.

When the second patch in a patch series depends on that the first patch
is fully applied, what does --check do? Without the first patch applied,
then a naive check of the second patch will certainly fail, doesn't it?

-- Hannes

Reply via email to