Hi, On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:53:04PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: > > After a bisect session, to clean up the bisection state and return to > > -the original HEAD, issue the following command: > > +the original HEAD (i.e., to finish bisect), issue the following command: > > Makes sense.
Doesn't ;) [aww, very sorry for this blunt reply] The main point of my mail was to stretch the (whether actually intended) *perceived* start <-> stop symmetry (which a *user* quite likely would end up searching for in the document, and fail to find any "stop" keyword, thus not getting to the relevant reset parameter section in time). Quite likely I failed to properly word things to make that obvious, in my quickly carved mail. To clarify intent behind these docs, I would thus propose to have the sentence improved to something quite similar to the original HEAD (i.e., to finish - "stop" a started - bisect), issue the following command: Thanks a ton for your immediate handling of my wishlist item! Andreas Mohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
