This commit addresses the problem reported in:
https://public-inbox.org/git/92cfdf43-8841-9c5a-7838-dda995038...@jeffhostetler.com/T/#mbaf8069f6d1bc18d5a02d3682a1f9282f5547ea9

As Duy suggested, pthread_getspecific() just returns NULL when NO_PTHREADS
is defined. And pthread_setspecific() silently does not nothing. So this
problem was hidden from view.

I have to wonder if we should update pthread_*specific() to call BUG() when
NO_PTHREADS is defined as a way to catch unguarded usages easier or make
this issue more clear.

Jeff Hostetler (1):
  trace2: fix tracing when NO_PTHREADS is defined

 trace2/tr2_tls.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


base-commit: aa25c82427ae70aebf3b8f970f2afd54e9a2a8c6
Published-As: 
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-222%2Fjeffhostetler%2Ftrace2-no-pthread-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git 
pr-222/jeffhostetler/trace2-no-pthread-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/222
-- 
gitgitgadget

Reply via email to