Before, when we rebased with a --fork-point invocation where the
fork-point wasn't empty, we would be setting options.restrict_revision.
The fast-forward logic would automatically declare that the rebase was
not fast-forwardable if it was set. However, this was painting with a
very broad brush.

Refine the logic so that we can fast-forward in the case where the
restricted revision is equal to the merge base, since we stop rebasing
at the merge base anyway.

Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.den...@gmail.com>
---
 builtin/rebase.c               |  9 +++++++--
 t/t3432-rebase-fast-forward.sh | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
index 7aa6a090d4..5f00d91b68 100644
--- a/builtin/rebase.c
+++ b/builtin/rebase.c
@@ -896,6 +896,7 @@ static int is_linear_history(struct commit *from, struct 
commit *to)
 }
 
 static int can_fast_forward(struct commit *onto, struct commit *upstream,
+                           struct commit *restrict_revision,
                            struct object_id *head_oid, struct object_id 
*merge_base)
 {
        struct commit *head = lookup_commit(the_repository, head_oid);
@@ -915,6 +916,9 @@ static int can_fast_forward(struct commit *onto, struct 
commit *upstream,
                goto done;
        }
 
+       if (restrict_revision && !oideq(&restrict_revision->object.oid, 
merge_base))
+               goto done;
+
        if (!upstream)
                goto done;
 
@@ -1701,8 +1705,9 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
*prefix)
         * Check if we are already based on onto with linear history,
         * but this should be done if this is not an interactive rebase.
         */
-       if (can_fast_forward(options.onto, options.upstream, 
&options.orig_head, &merge_base) &&
-           !is_interactive(&options) && !options.restrict_revision) {
+       if (can_fast_forward(options.onto, options.upstream, 
options.restrict_revision,
+                   &options.orig_head, &merge_base) &&
+           !is_interactive(&options)) {
                int flag;
 
                if (!(options.flags & REBASE_FORCE)) {
diff --git a/t/t3432-rebase-fast-forward.sh b/t/t3432-rebase-fast-forward.sh
index d0e5b1f3e6..1cb2896fb4 100755
--- a/t/t3432-rebase-fast-forward.sh
+++ b/t/t3432-rebase-fast-forward.sh
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ test_rebase_same_head success --onto B... B
 test_rebase_same_head success --onto master... master
 test_rebase_same_head success --no-fork-point
 test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point master
-test_rebase_same_head failure --fork-point --onto B B
-test_rebase_same_head failure --fork-point --onto B... B
+test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto B B
+test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto B... B
 test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto master... master
 
 test_expect_success 'add work to side' '
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ test_rebase_same_head success --onto B... B
 test_rebase_same_head success --onto master... master
 test_rebase_same_head success --no-fork-point
 test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point master
-test_rebase_same_head failure --fork-point --onto B B
-test_rebase_same_head failure --fork-point --onto B... B
+test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto B B
+test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto B... B
 test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto master... master
 
 test_expect_success 'add work to upstream' '
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ changes='our and their changes'
 test_rebase_same_head success --onto B B
 test_rebase_same_head success --onto B... B
 test_rebase_same_head success --onto master... master
-test_rebase_same_head failure --fork-point --onto B B
-test_rebase_same_head failure --fork-point --onto B... B
+test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto B B
+test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto B... B
 test_rebase_same_head success --fork-point --onto master... master
 
 test_done
-- 
2.21.0.921.gb27c68c4e9

Reply via email to