Denton Liu <liu.den...@gmail.com> writes: >> I suspect that such a rebase will become no-op without "-i". Am I >> mistaken? I am not sure if "--keep-base" is useful without "-i". > > It's useful in the case of "-x", although that is a grey area since "-x" > uses interactive machinery internally. Aside from "-x", I can't really > think of a situation where we would use "--keep-base" without "-i".
I consider "-x" is a mere sugar-coat around "-i". What I was getting at was if we need some mention of the fact in the documentation (e.g. "the option is accepted but fairly useless unless you are doing the rebase '-i/-x'").
