On Mon, Mar 25 2019, Denton Liu wrote:

> Hi Johannes,
>
> Thanks for catching this. Perhaps I should've been more diligent and ran
> the entire test suite before submitting but I was running low on
> batteries only ran the rebase-related tests.
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:14:23AM -0700, Johannes Schindelin via 
> GitGitGadget wrote:
>> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
>> [...]
>> @@ -325,6 +329,7 @@ file: (not set)
>>  EOF
>>
>>  test_expect_success 'negation of OPT_NONEG flags is not ambiguous' '
>> +    GIT_TEST_DISALLOW_ABBREVIATED_OPTIONS=false \
>>      test-tool parse-options --no-ambig >output 2>output.err &&
>>      test_must_be_empty output.err &&
>>      test_cmp expect output
>
> Would it make sense to include a test case to ensure that
> GIT_TEST_DISALLOW_ABBREVIATED_OPTIONS is working properly?

To elaborate on this since one might wonder "but aren't these those
tests?". I think you mean if we shouldn't have a "test_must_fail" test
there that asserts that parsing the options will die with the default of
GIT_TEST_DISALLOW_ABBREVIATED_OPTIONS=true. Yeah, that makes sense, it's
currently a blind spot that we just assume will keep working.

Reply via email to