On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The reason I'm raising this is that it seems like sweeping an existing
>> issue under the rug. We document that the "sid" is "unique", and it's just:
>>
>>     <nanotime / 1000 (i.e. *nix time in microseconds)>-<pid>
>
> If it is just that, then it cannot be unique, can it?
>
> Let's just fix the wrong doc and move on.

I don't see why we wouldn't just fix the SID generation & move on if
we're already carrying code purely as a work-around for it not being
unique enough.

Of course nothing is *guaranteed* to be unique, not even a 128-bit
UUID. The point is to pick something that's "unique enough" given the
problem space, which is already one where we'll ignore I/O errors on
writing the file unless you opt-in to a warning.

And it's a very useful property to have the SID be a) unique enough like
that so you can use a unique index for "git events" b) fixed-width
(which the current one *isn't*), so you can use fixed-with indexes in
some logging databases c) as a bonus, be human-readable at a glance,
hence spending slightly more space on the the YYYMM.. format in my
suggested SID format.

I can write that patch, but first it's useful to know if this is a case
Josh is running into, or if it's just a guard out of paranoia.

Reply via email to