Hi Phillip,

It’s nice to see your work on this on the list.

Le 19/03/2019 à 20:03, Phillip Wood a écrit :
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
> 
> In order to run `rebase -i` without forking `rebase--interactive` it
> will be convenient to use the same structure when parsing the options in
> cmd_rebase() and cmd_rebase__interactive().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
>  builtin/rebase.c | 203 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index c93f2aa629..33a2495032 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,73 @@ enum rebase_type {
>       REBASE_PRESERVE_MERGES
>  };
>  
> +struct rebase_options {
> +     enum rebase_type type;
> +     const char *state_dir;
> +     struct commit *upstream;
> +     const char *upstream_name;
> +     const char *upstream_arg;
> +     char *head_name;
> +     struct object_id orig_head;
> +     struct commit *onto;
> +     const char *onto_name;
> +     const char *revisions;
> +     const char *switch_to;
> +     int root;
> +     struct object_id *squash_onto;
> +     struct commit *restrict_revision;
> +     int dont_finish_rebase;
> +     enum {
> +             REBASE_NO_QUIET = 1<<0,
> +             REBASE_VERBOSE = 1<<1,
> +             REBASE_DIFFSTAT = 1<<2,
> +             REBASE_FORCE = 1<<3,
> +             REBASE_INTERACTIVE_EXPLICIT = 1<<4,
> +     } flags;
> +     struct argv_array git_am_opts;
> +     const char *action;
> +     int signoff;
> +     int allow_rerere_autoupdate;
> +     int keep_empty;
> +     int autosquash;
> +     char *gpg_sign_opt;
> +     int autostash;
> +     char *cmd;
> +     int allow_empty_message;
> +     int rebase_merges, rebase_cousins;
> +     char *strategy, *strategy_opts;
> +     struct strbuf git_format_patch_opt;
> +     int reschedule_failed_exec;
> +};
> +
> +#define REBASE_OPTIONS_INIT {                                \
> +             .type = REBASE_UNSPECIFIED,             \
> +             .flags = REBASE_NO_QUIET,               \
> +             .git_am_opts = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT,         \
> +             .git_format_patch_opt = STRBUF_INIT     \
> +     }
> +
> +static struct replay_opts get_replay_opts(const struct rebase_options *opts)
> +{
> +     struct replay_opts replay = REPLAY_OPTS_INIT;
> +
> +     sequencer_init_config(&replay);
> +
> +     replay.action = REPLAY_INTERACTIVE_REBASE;
> +     replay.signoff = opts->signoff;
> +     replay.allow_ff = !(opts->flags & REBASE_FORCE);
> +     if (opts->allow_rerere_autoupdate)
> +             replay.allow_rerere_auto = opts->allow_rerere_autoupdate;
> +     replay.allow_empty = 1;
> +     replay.allow_empty_message = opts->allow_empty_message;
> +     replay.verbose = opts->flags & REBASE_VERBOSE;
> +     replay.reschedule_failed_exec = opts->reschedule_failed_exec;
> +     replay.gpg_sign = xstrdup_or_null(opts->gpg_sign_opt);
> +     replay.strategy = opts->strategy;
> +
> +     return replay;
> +}
> +

I wonder if `struct rebase_options` and `struct replay_options` could be
merged, or at least have `replay_options` used in `rebase_options`,
instead of converting one to the other.  I think it would make things
simpler and cleaner, but I don’t know how hard it would be, or if my
assumption is correct.

Cheers,
Alban

Reply via email to