Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Martin Ågren wrote:
> 
>>> I just tried with asciidoc 2.0.0.rc.2, which came out last week. It does
>>> seem to work from the command line:
>>>
>>>   $ make USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=Yes \
>>>          ASCIIDOC_DOCBOOK=docbook5 \
>>>          ASCIIDOC='asciidoctor -amansource=Git -amanmanual="Git Manual"' \
>>>          git-add.xml
>>>   $ sed -n '/refmeta/,/refmeta/p' git-add.xml
>>>   <refmeta>
>>>   <refentrytitle>git-add</refentrytitle>
>>>   <manvolnum>1</manvolnum>
>>>   <refmiscinfo class="source">Git</refmiscinfo>
>>>   <refmiscinfo class="manual">Git Manual</refmiscinfo>
>>>   </refmeta>
>> 
>> No such luck with asciidoctor 1.5.5. Seems like it really wants
>> "manpage" before it considers these attributes.
>> 
>> (That's still me holding the tool, so factor that into it.)
> 
> The refmiscinfo stuff didn't arrive until asciidoctor v1.5.7.

Now I don't feel as bad that I didn't find any good way to
handle refmiscinfo when I first tried to use asciidoctor in
November 2017 at least.

This made me look closer at the fedora asciidoctor packages.
They have been stuck on 1.5.6.1.  So all my recent testing
has been with 1.5.6.1.

I spent some time yesterday working toward getting the
fedora packages updated to 1.5.8.  With luck that will reach
the stable updates channels before too long.

(I'm guessing the upcoming 2.0 release won't be suitable as
an update for released fedora versions, being a major
release with potentially backwards-incompatible changes.)

There are differences in the output from 1.5.6.1 and 1.5.8,
but I haven't looked closely yet.

-- 
Todd

Reply via email to