On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:31:21PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical > > timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order > > by 2 seconds, so mutt orders them wrong): > > > > https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.163.git.gitgitgad...@gmail.com/ > > > > I do still think GGG has a more feasible path forward on this particular > > bug, though. > > Indeed. And it is a bug^Wfeature of GMail, I guess, that it knows better > and ignores the Date: header of the mbox fed to it.
Heh. So it in fact has the identical problem that submitGit and SES have. :) > The only workaround I can think of is to introduce ugly one-second-sleeps. > I will do that if it proves necessary, but I do have a problem right now > because my only GitGitGadget reviewer (Stolee) is kinda busy with other > things for the time being. I suspect that may be the ultimate solution. Which isn't fantastic, but at the same time, I doubt anybody would really notice that much. There are typically delays of seconds to minutes already in delivering email. Unless somebody has a 200 patch series, but maybe then it is kinder to the receivers to let it trickle in. ;) -Peff
