On 03/11, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Agreed, I'd be happy to keep the parameter there.  Looking at your
> > fork, you seem to have some WIP patches to introduce a UNUSED macro
> > for parameters like this, which I don't think I've seen on the list
> > yet (though I may have just missed them).
> >
> > I guess it's probably best for you to mark this parameter as UNUSED as
> > part of your series, but if you have a different preference on how to
> > handle it, let me know.
> 
> I agree that the uniformity among near-toplevel helpers like
> create_stash() is a good thing to have.
> 
> In the meantime, you want the patch you sent (below) on top of the
> stash-in-c topic to address do_drop_stash()?

Yes, I think that would be good, thanks! (And if I read Peff's reply
in this thread correctly, I think that's his preference as well).

I also just realized that this is patch 2/2 as I created it on the
same branch as the pathspec fixups.  But they are really independent,
even though they should both end up on top of ps/stash-in-c.

> Thanks for working well together.
> 
> > --- >8 ---
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] stash: drop unused parameter
> >
> > Drop the unused prefix parameter in do_drop_stash.
> >
> > We also have an unused "prefix" parameter in the 'create_stash'
> > function, however we leave that in place for symmetry with the other
> > top-level functions.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  builtin/stash.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/stash.c b/builtin/stash.c
> > index 6eb67c75c3..069bf14846 100644
> > --- a/builtin/stash.c
> > +++ b/builtin/stash.c
> > @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, 
> > const char *prefix)
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int do_drop_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info, int 
> > quiet)
> > +static int do_drop_stash(struct stash_info *info, int quiet)
> >  {
> >     int ret;
> >     struct child_process cp_reflog = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> > @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static int drop_stash(int argc, const char **argv, 
> > const char *prefix)
> >  
> >     assert_stash_ref(&info);
> >  
> > -   ret = do_drop_stash(prefix, &info, quiet);
> > +   ret = do_drop_stash(&info, quiet);
> >     free_stash_info(&info);
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static int pop_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const 
> > char *prefix)
> >             printf_ln(_("The stash entry is kept in case "
> >                         "you need it again."));
> >     else
> > -           ret = do_drop_stash(prefix, &info, quiet);
> > +           ret = do_drop_stash(&info, quiet);
> >  
> >     free_stash_info(&info);
> >     return ret;
> > @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ static int branch_stash(int argc, const char **argv, 
> > const char *prefix)
> >     if (!ret)
> >             ret = do_apply_stash(prefix, &info, 1, 0);
> >     if (!ret && info.is_stash_ref)
> > -           ret = do_drop_stash(prefix, &info, 0);
> > +           ret = do_drop_stash(&info, 0);
> >  
> >     free_stash_info(&info);

Reply via email to