On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 2:17 AM Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:17 AM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Completion for restore is straightforward. We could still do better > > though by give the list of just tracked files instead of all present > > ones. But let's leave it for later. > > s/give/giving/ > > I'm slightly worried that due to using --no-overlay mode by default in > restore, having tab-completion include untracked files increases the > risk of accidentally nuking the wrong file. restore is a destructive > command anyway and should thus be used with care, so perhaps this > isn't a big deal, but I thought I'd mention it.
This makes me think about my "git restore :/" example, which does not remove untracked files because its source is the index. But isn't it inconsistent that we only remove untracked files with --source and keep them without? Will that just confuse people more? Or did I just forget to implement no-overlay mode for the index too? Side note, to enable overlay mode again in git restore, maybe "git restore --keep-untracked --source..." will be better than "git restore --overlay --source..." -- Duy
