On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 12:49 AM Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com> wrote: > > > > On 08/03/2019 09:57, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > [snip] > > Range-diff dựa trên v2: > > -: ---------- > 1: 949f3dd4fd git-checkout.txt: spell out --no-option > > 1: 8358b9ca36 = 2: 1ddbbae3e2 git-checkout.txt: fix one syntax line > > 2: 1686ccbf8d ! 3: b0cb2372db doc: document --overwrite-ignore > > @@ -14,14 +14,15 @@ > > out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than > > one > > worktree. > > > > -+--[no-]overwrite-ignore:: > > ++--overwrite-ignore:: > > ++--no-overwrite-ignore:: > > Just curious, but why? Is '--[no-]overwrite-ignore' thought to > be harder to read? What about the rest of the man-pages?
It's also easier to search. If I remember correctly I did search for the rest of man pages and the --no- wins over --[no-] -- Duy
