Hi Ævar, On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26 2019, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > > > As I was advocating for this series to go into 'next' without a large > > refactor of this series, I'll put my money were my mouth is and try to > > make the cleanups and fixes required, though without trying to avoid > > further external process calls, or changing the series around too > > much. > > > > One thing to consider here is that we have a GSoC project planned > > based on 'git stash'. If we can't get this to 'next' soon, I'd vote > > for taking that project out of this years GSoC, and maybe try again > > next year, if nobody implemented the feature in the meantime. > > FWIW I'd like to +1 getting it into "next" so this can be given thorough > testing in the 2.22 Indeed. It is time. > If there's still bugs or other regressions I think it's better sorted > out without the cognitive load of reviewing it all again. Fully agree! > Worst case we can always add something on top to flip the default of > stash.useBuiltin. I actually don't think that will be necessary. If my track record with fixing all kinds of built-in rebase corner-case bugs leading up to v2.20.0 is any indication, the built-in stash will be cooking well. Ciao, Dscho
