Hi, Ævar

Thank you for helping me out on this series and, especially, for the tests part.

Now that we've come to a consensus on what the overall series' "shape"
should be, can I refine what's still needed and resubmit it, in the
upcoming days, as a patch set with the test included?

Best,
Matheus Tavares


On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:28 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<ava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There's still active review going on for the "v2"[1], in particular
> Duy's comments coming in as I write this. This doesn't address any of
> that.
>
> What it does do is have a better version of my patch to add tests for
> the current behavior. It now doesn't reply the on SHA1 prereq anymore,
> and we can test the dotfiles without needing the SYMLINK prereq.
>
> I also moved it to the front of the series just to document/make sure
> that we start by asserting testing functionality. I ran a full test
> suite run for each of these patches and they all pass.
>
> The only other change is getting rid of an unused "struct stat st"
> variable which errored out under DEVELOPER=1.
>
> 1. 
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20190226051804.10631-1-matheus.bernard...@usp.br/
>
> Matheus Tavares (4):
>   dir-iterator: add flags parameter to dir_iterator_begin
>   clone: copy hidden paths at local clone
>   clone: extract function from copy_or_link_directory
>   clone: use dir-iterator to avoid explicit dir traversal
>
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (1):
>   clone: test for our behavior on odd objects/* content
>
>  builtin/clone.c            |  69 ++++++++++-------
>  dir-iterator.c             |  28 ++++++-
>  dir-iterator.h             |  40 ++++++++--
>  refs/files-backend.c       |   2 +-
>  t/t5604-clone-reference.sh | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.0.rc2.261.ga7da99ff1b
>

Reply via email to