On February 18, 2019 15:25, Max Kirillov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 10:57:52AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I'm inclined to > > > > - keep b46221ff in 'master', not reverted. > > from the branch, cc95bc2025 "t5562: replace /dev/zero with a pipe from > generate_zero_bytes" could be replaced with [1] > "t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero", for simplicity. I cannot however test > the issue as I have no access to the platform in question. As far as I > understand, both should work. > > [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20190215164237.12250-1- > m...@max630.net/
AFAIK, b46221ff and [1] should be included. I have no preference on the title. As soon as (dT based $DAYJOB and $SLEEP) the merge is available (or -rc2) comes out, I will test t5562 then run a full regression on NonStop and report back. t5562 takes under a minute. The full suite is 50 hours. How's that? Cheers, Randall
