On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:55 AM Sebastian Staudt <korak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We don't use NEED_WORK_TREE when running the git-describe builtin,
> since you should be able to describe a commit even in a bare repository.
> However, the --dirty flag does need a working tree. Since we don't call
> setup_work_tree(), it uses whatever directory we happen to be in. That's
> unlikely to match our index, meaning we'd say "dirty" even when the real
> working tree is clean.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt <korak...@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
> @@ -145,14 +145,38 @@ check_describe A-* HEAD
> +test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' '
> + [...]
> +'
>
> +test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' '
> + [...]
> +'
Can you give these two new tests different titles to make it easier to
narrow down a problem to one or the other if one of them does fail?
Perhaps the second test could be titled:
test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with dirty --work-tree' '
or something.
