Sent from my iPhone...
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 15:59, SZEDER Gábor <szeder....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:46:07PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 2:47 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jerem...@apple.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jerem...@apple.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> t/test-lib.sh | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> This obviously won't be acceptable as-is to my tree. Shouldn't this
>>> be something to be dealt with in config.mak.uname or something that
>>> is meant to define platform-specific customization?
>>
>> The issue here is that we're not locating relocatable perl modules
>> during testing. This is a general problem with testing
>> RUNTIME_PREFIX configurations, and a more general solution to this
>> sledgehammer would be appropriate. I don't think config.mak.uname
>> really makes sense since it's a general RUNTIME_PREFIX issue and not
>> specifically a darwin issue.
>
> But this patch is very darwin-specific ...
>
>>>> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
>>>> index 0f1faa24b2..4060a53f56 100644
>>>> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
>>>> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
>>>> @@ -1017,6 +1017,9 @@ fi
>>>>
>>>> GITPERLLIB="$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/perl/build/lib
>>>> export GITPERLLIB
>>>> +PERL_VERSION=$(grep DEFAULT /usr/local/versioner/perl/versions | sed
>>>> 's:^.*= *\([^ ]*\)$:\1:')
>>>> +PERL5LIB="$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/perl:"$(xcode-select
>>>> -p)"/Library/Perl/$PERL_VERSION
>
> ... because what other platforms could possibly have 'xcode-select'
> installed!? Consequently:
>
> $ ./t0000-basic.sh
> grep: /usr/local/versioner/perl/versions: No such file or directory
> ./t0000-basic.sh: 1154: ./test-lib.sh: xcode-select: not found
> ok 1 - verify that the running shell supports "local"
> ok 2 - .git/objects should be empty after git init in an empty repo
> ok 3 - .git/objects should have 3 subdirectories
> ok 4 - success is reported like this
> not ok 5 - pretend we have a fully passing test suite
> <...>
> # failed 29 among 82 test(s)
Yes. This is one of the patches that I said in the 00 message would certainly
not be upstreamable but for which we should find a general solution to the
problem if one is available.
>
>
>
>>>> +export PERL5LIB
>>>> test -d "$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/templates/blt || {
>>>> error "You haven't built things yet, have you?"
>>>> }
>>
