Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> writes: > ... Instead, I decided that > instead of having a "from" and a "to" header, we would have N "from" > headers (since all parents are what we came from) and 1 "to" header. > I hope that makes sense, because otherwise I think this become to > unwieldy of a change.
Yeah, it makes sense for an N-way merge to have N 'from' pathnames that resulted in a single 'to' pathname in the resulting tree.
