Jonathan Tan <jonathanta...@google.com> writes: >> The in-core repository instances are passed through more codepaths. > > I think this is ready to be considered for merging to next. This series looks > good both to Stolee [1] and to me (I replied to a previous version with > comments on patch 18 [2] which Stefan has addressed, as can be seen in the > inter-diff provided by Junio [3] - I probably should have replied to the > latest > version stating this too).
Alright, thanks. While attempting to resolve conflicts with this and Peff's "get rid of has_sha1_file()" topic, I found it somewhat disturbing that sha1-file.c still was a mixture of functions that do and do not take the repository pointer, but perhaps it's something we need to polish over time on top.
