On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 01:18, brian m. carlson
<sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> I think this change is fine, because we initialize the value in
> the_repository elsewhere, and if there's no repository, this should
> never have a value other than the default anyway.

Thanks, it feels good that this patch matches how you think about the
`hash_algo` field.

> I looked at the other patches in the series and thought they looked sane
> as well.

Thanks for a review, I appreciate it.


Martin

Reply via email to