The post-rewrite hook is documented as being invoked by commands that
rewrite commits such as commit --amend and rebase, and that it will
be called for each rewritten commit.
Apparently, the three backends handled --skip'ed commits differently:
am: treat the skipped commit as though it weren't rewritten
merge: same as 'am' backend
interactive: treat skipped commits as having been rewritten to empty
(view them as an empty fixup to their parent)
For now, just add a testcase documenting the different behavior (use
--keep to force usage of the interactive machinery even though we have
no empty commits). A subsequent commit will remove the inconsistency in
--skip handling.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
---
t/t5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh b/t/t5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh
index 9b2a274c71..6426ec8991 100755
--- a/t/t5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh
+++ b/t/t5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh
@@ -125,6 +125,37 @@ test_expect_success 'git rebase -m --skip' '
verify_hook_input
'
+test_expect_success 'git rebase with implicit use of interactive backend' '
+ git reset --hard D &&
+ clear_hook_input &&
+ test_must_fail git rebase --keep --onto A B &&
+ echo C > foo &&
+ git add foo &&
+ git rebase --continue &&
+ echo rebase >expected.args &&
+ cat >expected.data <<-EOF &&
+ $(git rev-parse C) $(git rev-parse HEAD^)
+ $(git rev-parse D) $(git rev-parse HEAD)
+ EOF
+ verify_hook_input
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git rebase --skip with implicit use of interactive
backend' '
+ git reset --hard D &&
+ clear_hook_input &&
+ test_must_fail git rebase --keep --onto A B &&
+ test_must_fail git rebase --skip &&
+ echo D > foo &&
+ git add foo &&
+ git rebase --continue &&
+ echo rebase >expected.args &&
+ cat >expected.data <<-EOF &&
+ $(git rev-parse C) $(git rev-parse HEAD^)
+ $(git rev-parse D) $(git rev-parse HEAD)
+ EOF
+ verify_hook_input
+'
+
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-rebase.sh
set_fake_editor
--
2.20.0.8.g5de428d695
