On Fri, Dec 07 2018, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:

> Hi, all:
>
> Every now and again I come across a patch sent to LKML without a leading
> "diff a/foo b/foo" -- usually produced by quilt. E.g.:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181125185004.151077...@linutronix.de/
>
> I am guessing quilt does not bother including the leading "diff a/foo
> b/foo" because it's redundant with the next two lines, however this
> remains a valid patch recognized by git-am.
>
> If you pipe that patch via git-patch-id, it produces nothing, but if I
> put in the leading "diff", like so:
>
> diff a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>
> then it properly returns "fb3ae17451bc619e3d7f0dd647dfba2b9ce8992e".
>
> Can we please teach git-patch-id to work without the leading diff a/foo
> b/foo, same as git-am?
>
> Best,
> -K

The state machine is sensitive there being a "diff" line, then "index"
etc.

diff --git a/builtin/patch-id.c b/builtin/patch-id.c
index 970d0d30b4..b99e4455fd 100644
--- a/builtin/patch-id.c
+++ b/builtin/patch-id.c
@@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ static int get_one_patchid(struct object_id *next_oid, struct 
object_id *result,
                }

                /* Ignore commit comments */
-               if (!patchlen && !starts_with(line, "diff "))
+               if (!patchlen && starts_with(line, "--- a/"))
+                       ;
+               else if (!patchlen && !starts_with(line, "diff "))
                        continue;

                /* Parsing diff header?  */

This would make it produce a patch-id for that input, however note that
I've done "--- a/" there, with just "--- " (which is legit) we'd get
confused and start earlier before the diffstat.

So if you're interested in having this I leave it to you to run with
this & write tests for it, but more convincingly run it on the git &
LKML archives and see that the output is the same (or just extra in case
where we now find patches) with --stable etc.

Reply via email to