On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 3:23 PM Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was curious about what versions of Gerrit this is designed to
> support (or in other words whether it's a bug fix or a feature).
> Looking at examples like [1], it seems that Gerrit historically always
> used "ERROR:" so the 59a255aef0 logic would work for it. More
> recently, [2] (ReceiveCommits: add a "SUCCESS" marker for successful
> change updates, 2018-08-21) put SUCCESS on a line of its own. That
> puts this squarely in the new-feature category.
Ooops. From the internal bug, I assumed this to be long standing Gerrit
behavior, which is why I sent it out in -rc to begin with.
> > --- a/sideband.c
> > +++ b/sideband.c
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest,
> > const char *src, int n)
> > struct keyword_entry *p = keywords + i;
> > int len = strlen(p->keyword);
> >
> > - if (n <= len)
> > + if (n < len)
> > continue;
>
> In the old code, we would escape early if 'n == len', but we didn't
> need to. If 'n == len', then
>
> src[len] == '\0'
src[len] could also be one of "\n\r", see the caller
recv_sideband for sidebase case 2.
> src .. &src[len-1] is a valid buffer to read from
>
> so the strncasecmp and strbuf_add operations used in this function are
> valid. Good.
Yes, they are all valid...
> > - if (!strncasecmp(p->keyword, src, len) && !isalnum(src[len]))
> > {
> > + if (!strncasecmp(p->keyword, src, len) &&
> > + (len == n || !isalnum(src[len]))) {
>
> Our custom isalnum treats '\0' as not alphanumeric (sane_ctype[0] ==
> GIT_CNTRL) so this part of the patch is unnecessary. That said, it's
> good for clarity and defensive programming.
... but here we need to check for src[len] for validity.
I made no assumptions about isalnum, but rather needed to shortcut
the condition, as accessing src[len] would be out of bounds, no?
>
> > strbuf_addstr(dest, p->color);
> > strbuf_add(dest, src, len);
unlike here (or the rest of the block), where len is used correctly.
