On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 06:04:54AM +0100, tbo...@web.de wrote: > From: Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> > > Currently the length of data which is stored in memory is stored > in "unsigned long" at many places in the code base. > This is OK when both "unsigned long" and size_t are 32 bits, > (and is OK when both are 64 bits). > On a 64 bit Windows system am "unsigned long" is 32 bit, and > that may be too short to measure the size of objects in memory, > a size_t is the natural choice. > > Improve the code base in "small steps", as small as possible. > The smallest step seems to be much bigger than expected.
Ops, it seems as if I send this message out twice - please ignore the "PATCH/RFC v2 1/1" Sorry for the noise.
