On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 10:47:10AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > diff --git a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > index e8377286d..86d3f93fa 100755 > --- a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > +++ b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > @@ -197,9 +197,9 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'show bad signature with custom > format' ' > test_expect_success GPG 'show untrusted signature with custom format' ' > cat >expect <<-\EOF && > U > - 61092E85B7227189 > + 65A0EEA02E30CAD7 > Eris Discordia <[email protected]> > - D4BE22311AD3131E5EDA29A461092E85B7227189 > + F8364A59E07FFE9F4D63005A65A0EEA02E30CAD7 > D4BE22311AD3131E5EDA29A461092E85B7227189 > EOF > git log -1 --format="%G?%n%GK%n%GS%n%GF%n%GP" eighth-signed-alt >actual > && > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'show untrusted signature with > custom format' ' > test_expect_success GPG 'show unknown signature with custom format' ' > cat >expect <<-\EOF && > E > - 61092E85B7227189 > + 65A0EEA02E30CAD7
It's my understanding that GnuPG will use the most recent subkey suitable for a particular purpose, and I think the test relies on that behavior. However, I'm not sure that's documented. Do we want to rely on that behavior or be more explicit? (This is a question, not an opinion.) -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
