Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> writes:

> Fair enough.  I thought of the technical documentation as something
> that doesn't promise users anything, but rather describes how the
> internals work right now, which is what this bit of documentation
> attempted to write down.

That's fine.  I'd rather keep it but perhaps add a reminder to tell
readers that it works only when the merging of contents that already
records with nested conflict markers happen to "cleanly nest".

Thanks.

Reply via email to